Australia’s online safety regulator has initiated legal action against messaging platform Telegram, accusing the company of failing to remove violent extremist material despite receiving reports about the content. The case, filed in the Federal Court, marks one of the country’s most significant enforcement actions under its online safety laws and could lead to fines of up to A$54.6 million if the court finds Telegram in breach.
Australian Regulator Alleges Delayed Removal of Extremist Content
The Australian eSafety Commissioner claims Telegram did not act quickly enough to remove videos and other violent material linked to terrorist organizations and high-profile mass shootings. According to the regulator, the content included footage associated with the 2019 Christchurch mosque attacks, the 2022 Buffalo supermarket shooting, and Islamic State execution videos.
Authorities argue that such content remained accessible on Telegram channels and groups for extended periods, despite being reported by users. The watchdog says the platform failed to meet its obligations under Australia’s Online Safety Act, which requires digital services to take reasonable steps to detect and remove illegal extremist material.
Telegram Rejects the Allegations
Telegram has denied the accusations and says it plans to defend itself in court. The company maintains that it actively combats terrorist content and has removed more than 150,000 communities linked to extremist organizations this year.
The messaging service also stated that it continues to improve its moderation efforts while balancing user privacy and freedom of expression. However, Australian regulators argue that stronger and faster action is necessary to prevent harmful material from spreading online.
Case Could Shape Future Online Safety Enforcement
The lawsuit is expected to become a major test of Australia’s online safety framework and may influence how governments hold technology companies accountable for harmful content on their platforms.
If the court rules against Telegram, the platform could face financial penalties and increased regulatory scrutiny. The case also highlights growing global pressure on social media and messaging platforms to respond more quickly to reports of terrorist propaganda and violent extremist content.
