Skepticism Mounts as WarMonitor3 Reports on Mace-Bondi ‘Spy Folder’ Allegations Amid Epstein File Fallout
Deep Search & Context
Prominent open-source intelligence (OSINT) aggregator WarMonitor3 has shifted focus from the frontlines of Ukraine to a brewing domestic crisis within the U.S. Justice Department. The account recently highlighted a heated conflict between Representative Nancy Mace (R-SC) and Attorney General Pam Bondi regarding the handling of unredacted Jeffrey Epstein files. The controversy centers on Mace’s explosive claim that during a House Judiciary Committee hearing, Bondi was photographed holding a folder explicitly labeled with Mace’s name and “search history.” This implies the Department of Justice may be monitoring the specific database queries made by members of Congress who are attempting to oversee the Epstein investigation.
Background Info
The dispute comes at a volatile moment in February 2026, following the release of new court records tied to the Epstein sex-trafficking investigation. These documents have triggered intense scrutiny of federal prosecutors’ past conduct. Nancy Mace has been a vocal critic of the DOJ’s transparency, pushing for full disclosure of the files. The allegation that the Attorney General is maintaining dossiers on the investigative habits of sitting Congress members raises severe constitutional questions regarding the separation of powers and congressional oversight. WarMonitor3, typically known for rapid-fire military updates, has increasingly covered these high-stakes political fissures, signaling how domestic instability is beginning to rival geopolitical conflicts in the information space.
Objections & Public Reaction
The immediate reaction to the report has been one of profound disbelief, encapsulated by the user response, “You’re joking of course.” This skepticism cuts two ways:
Disbelief at the Allegation: Viewers find the idea that an Attorney General would openly carry a “spy folder” on a Congress member to a hearing to be too brazen or Orwellian to be real, suspecting a misunderstanding or a doctored image.
Credibility Concerns: As OSINT accounts often prioritize speed over verification, some users instinctively question whether this dramatic political narrative is being sensationalized. The “You’re joking” sentiment highlights the difficulty in distinguishing between genuine political scandal and satire in an increasingly polarized media environment.
Despite the skepticism, the visual evidence referenced by WarMonitor3 has forced a serious conversation about the extent of surveillance within the federal government.
reddit.com
liveuamap.com
newconservativepost.com
sofrep.com
