Prosecutors Drop Fraud Charges Against Florida Contractor Ricky McGraw Weeks Before Trial
State prosecutors in Lee County, Florida, have dismissed all criminal charges against roofing contractor Ricky McGraw, citing insufficient evidence just days before his case was set to go to trial. McGraw, the owner of SFR Services, had been accused of orchestrating a $214,000 insurance fraud scheme, allegations that state officials previously highlighted as a primary example of the issues driving Florida’s property insurance crisis.
Deep Search: Case Collapse and Details
The State Attorney’s Office filed a nolle prosequi—a formal notice abandoning the prosecution—effectively clearing McGraw of first-degree felony charges, including insurance fraud and grand theft. The charges stemmed from accusations that McGraw intentionally inflated and overbilled a roof replacement claim to defraud Tower Hill Insurance Company.
When McGraw was arrested in 2023, Florida’s Chief Financial Officer Jimmy Patronis publicly characterized him as the “poster child” for the state’s collapsing insurance market, describing him as the type of actor responsible for skyrocketing premiums. However, the case unraveled when prosecutors determined they could not prove the allegations in court. This marks the second high-profile insurance fraud case against a contractor to fall apart in Florida within the last 18 months, following similar dismissals in Hillsborough and Manatee counties.
Background: The War on Assignment of Benefits
The prosecution of McGraw occurred against the backdrop of Florida’s aggressive legislative crackdown on “assignment of benefits” (AOB). This practice allowed homeowners to sign over their insurance claim rights to contractors, who could then sue insurers directly for non-payment or underpayment.
State data indicates that McGraw’s company, SFR Services, was a prolific user of this system, filing more than 1,100 lawsuits against insurance companies between 2019 and 2023. Insurers and state officials have long argued that such litigation volume is a key driver of the state’s insurance instability, leading to reforms that have since severely restricted AOB practices. The Department of Financial Services has maintained that its Criminal Investigations Division prioritizes protecting Floridians from fraud, though they did not provide a detailed explanation for the sudden dismissal of McGraw’s charges.
Objections: Defense Claims Targeting and Ruin
McGraw and his legal team contend that the prosecution was never about fraud but rather a political effort to silence a contractor who aggressively challenged insurance companies. McGraw stated he was “100% targeted” because of the volume of claims his company handled and the lawsuits he filed to force insurers to pay.
“They got what they needed,” McGraw said following the dismissal. “They got me out of the industry for three years.” He noted that despite his exoneration, his company is now in ruins, and he has received no apology from the state agencies that publicized his arrest. His attorney, Anthony Giasi, echoed these sentiments, suggesting that officials used McGraw to set an example during a period of intense political pressure to fix the insurance market.
Neutral Perspective: Legal and Industry Implications
The quiet dismissal of the charges contrasts sharply with the high-profile announcement of the arrest. While the Department of Financial Services continues to assert the necessity of fraud investigations to stabilize the market, the collapse of the case raises questions about the strength of evidence in complex construction fraud prosecutions. For the industry, the event underscores the ongoing tension between contractors attempting to recover costs and state regulators determined to curb litigation abuse.
tampabay.com
miamiherald.com
propertyinsurancecoveragelaw.com
myfloridacfo.com
