Washington, D.C. / December 2, 2025 — Pop singer Sabrina Carpenter condemned a video recently shared by the White House that used her hit song “Juno” to soundtrack footage of deportation raids by the U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE).
🎤 Carpenter’s Reaction
In an X (formerly Twitter) post, Carpenter wrote:
“This video is evil and disgusting. Do not ever involve me or my music to benefit your inhumane agenda.”
Her response adds her name to a growing list of artists who have publicly objected to their music being used in politically charged government messaging.
⚠️ Broader Implications: Art, Consent and Political Messaging
- The use of “Juno” in the ICE video without clear consent highlights an ongoing debate over whether governments should be allowed to repurpose copyrighted art — especially when linked to controversial policies.
- Critics argue such use amounts to implicit endorsement, while artists see it as a misappropriation of their creative work.
🔎 What to Watch Next
- Will Carpenter or her legal team pursue a takedown or rights-infringement request as others have done in similar cases?
- Will other artists speak out, or will public pressure prompt the White House to revise its social-media practices?
- Might this lead to clearer rules or legislation governing the use of copyrighted material by government entities?
