Pennsylvania Governor Faces Steep Political and Economic Hurdles to Solve Housing Crisis
Rising housing costs and a severe shortage of available units have placed immense pressure on Pennsylvania residents, with rents soaring and homeownership slipping out of reach for many. State officials estimate that Pennsylvania needs to construct nearly 450,000 new housing units by 2035 to meet current demand, a staggering 70 percent increase in construction activity. In response, Governor Josh Shapiro signed Executive Order 2024-03, mandating the creation of a comprehensive statewide housing action plan to address these deficits and review the efficacy of existing programs.
However, the path to implementation is fraught with significant political and structural obstacles. One of the primary challenges Shapiro must overcome is the fiercely protected tradition of local control over zoning. Municipal governments and their representing associations have historically opposed state-level mandates that override local planning codes. These groups argue that local officials understand their communities’ specific needs better than state regulators and that zoning reform effectively scapegoats municipalities for broader economic issues like inflation and supply chain disruptions.
Funding remains another major point of contention within the divided state legislature. While the Whole-Home Repairs program—designed to help low-income homeowners maintain aging properties—initially received bipartisan support and $125 million in federal pandemic aid, efforts to secure permanent state funding have faltered. Governor Shapiro’s subsequent proposal to allocate $50 million for a rebranded version of the program was cut from the final budget deal, highlighting the difficulty of maintaining fiscal support for housing initiatives amidst competing financial priorities.
Critics also point out that regulatory changes alone may not solve the crisis. Builders and developers cite high interest rates, the rising cost of construction materials, and labor shortages as critical factors stifling new development. Opponents of aggressive state intervention argue that market-driven solutions, rather than government subsidies or mandates, should dictate the recovery of the housing sector.
As the Department of Community and Economic Development works toward submitting a draft plan, the administration faces the complex task of balancing urgent housing needs with the political realities of a split legislature and powerful local government lobbies. Success will require navigating deep-seated disagreements over land use, securing consistent revenue streams for affordability programs, and addressing the economic headwinds that continue to constrain the construction industry.
spotlightpa.org
lockhaven.com
pew.org
post-gazette.com
pa.gov
