Iran’s leadership has reiterated that the country is not pursuing nuclear weapons, a pivotal statement made by President Masoud Pezeshkian amid ongoing negotiations with global powers. At the same time, he offered a rare public admission of remorse over the government’s forceful repression of nationwide protests that have shaken the Islamic Republic.
President Condemns Nuclear Weapon Claims, Mulls Transparency
During a major national gathering marking the anniversary of the 1979 revolution, President Pezeshkian stressed that Iran’s nuclear program is peaceful in nature and not aimed at developing atomic bombs. He signalled willingness to allow verification of Iran’s nuclear activities to address international concerns, though practical access for inspectors remains constrained.
The president’s comments come as U.S.–Iran negotiations are tenuous, with American officials warning of steep consequences if diplomatic efforts fail and some voices in Tehran calling for a firm stance against what they see as undue external pressure.
“Shame” Over Crackdown as Unrest Still Looms Large
In a departure from typical official rhetoric, Pezeshkian acknowledged deep public sorrow and “shame” over the brutal suppression of widespread protests earlier this year. The demonstrations, driven by socio-economic grievances and political dissent, have left thousands dead and tens of thousands detained in one of the most severe internal crises Iran has seen.
Despite expressing remorse, the president stopped short of directly confronting the security forces over the violent response, drawing criticism from reformists and human rights advocates who argue the government must take stronger responsibility for the bloodshed.
Diplomacy in a Fragile Balance
Iran’s refusal to include its ballistic missile program in nuclear talks underscores a persistent diplomatic impasse. Tehran insists on focusing discussions solely on its civilian nuclear activities, while external powers, including the United States and Israel, are pushing for broader concessions.
Amid these tensions, regional dialogues and mediations continue, with varied perspectives emerging from within Iran’s political establishment on how best to navigate both internal pressures and external demands.
