Border Hawk Editor Dan Lyman Features on InfoWars Segment Regarding Migrant Crime Allegations
Dan Lyman, the editor-in-chief of the immigration-focused media outlet Border Hawk, appeared on an InfoWars broadcast this week to discuss what the two organizations characterize as a surging crisis of “migrant crime” within the United States. The segment focused heavily on recent reports aggregated by Border Hawk, specifically highlighting a fatal collision in Indiana involving a Kyrgyz national and an Amish family. During the appearance, Lyman and the InfoWars host discussed the suspect’s alleged entry into the U.S. via the government’s CBP One app, using the incident to criticize current federal border policies.
Deep Search: The Specific Allegations
The discussion centered on a vehicle collision that resulted in the deaths of an Amish father and his sons. Border Hawk and InfoWars reported that the truck driver involved was a national from Kyrgyzstan who had been released into the U.S. after processing. The segment utilized this specific tragedy to broader arguments regarding national security, claiming that the “CBP One” asylum app is facilitating the entry of individuals who may pose public safety risks. Lyman contended that such incidents are not isolated but are part of a pattern ignored by mainstream outlets, a narrative central to Border Hawk’s editorial mission.
Background Information
Border Hawk is a news aggregator and content producer that describes itself as having a “hyperfocus” on immigration and border security. It is run by Dan Lyman, who has previously served as a foreign correspondent for InfoWars in Europe. The outlet often publishes viral clips of border crossings and confrontations, which are frequently picked up by larger conservative networks like One America News (OAN).
InfoWars, founded by Alex Jones, remains a controversial hub for alternative media and conspiracy theories. Despite facing significant legal challenges—including a reported liquidation order in late 2025 stemming from defamation judgments owed to Sandy Hook families—the platform continues to operate and publish content. The continued collaboration between Border Hawk and InfoWars illustrates the resilience of this alternative media ecosystem, where figures like Lyman frequently cross-pollinate between platforms to amplify specific narratives.
Objections and Criticism
Critics and media watchdogs strongly dispute the framing presented by both Border Hawk and InfoWars. The Southern Poverty Law Center (SPLC) has previously classified Border Hawk as part of an “anti-immigrant network,” alleging that the outlet has ties to white nationalist figures and rhetoric. Furthermore, criminologists and data analysts often point out that despite high-profile anecdotes highlighted by these outlets, statistical evidence generally shows that immigrants (both legal and undocumented) have lower incarceration and crime rates than native-born U.S. citizens. Opponents argue that focusing on individual violent crimes committed by migrants is a fear-mongering tactic designed to stoke xenophobia rather than a reflection of statistical reality. Additionally, the legal status of InfoWars remains a point of contention, with critics arguing the platform’s continued operation undermines judicial accountability.
infowars.com
wikipedia.org
