Headline: AG Bondi Ignites House Hearing, Demands Apology from Nadler Over “Russia Hoax” in Explosive Clash
Washington, D.C. – In a hearing that rapidly descended into chaos on Wednesday, Attorney General Pam Bondi launched a blistering counterattack against Representative Jerry Nadler (D-NY) and House Democrats, turning a routine oversight session into a fiery confrontation over former President Donald Trump’s past impeachments and the Russia investigation.
The exchange occurred during a House Judiciary Committee hearing intended to cover Department of Justice oversight. Tensions peaked when Rep. Nadler pressed the Attorney General on specific Department actions. Instead of a standard bureaucratic response, Bondi pivoted to a scorched-earth defense of the administration, directly challenging the legitimacy of the committee’s past investigations.
The Heated Exchange
Witnesses described the room as “lit up” by the intensity of the confrontation. After enduring a line of questioning she characterized as partisan attacks, Bondi interrupted Nadler with a voice that cut through the commotion.
“Have any of YOU apologized to President Trump for the Russia hoax impeachment circus?” Bondi demanded, gesturing to the Democratic members of the panel.
As Nadler attempted to reclaim his time, arguing that the Attorney General was being non-responsive, Bondi refused to yield.
“I’m NOT going to sit here and take this,” she declared, overriding the Congressman’s objections. “I’m not going to get in the gutter with these people.”
Deep Search: The “Russia Hoax” Context
Bondi’s reference to the “Russia hoax impeachment circus” targets the long-standing grievance among Trump supporters regarding the accusations of collusion between the 2016 Trump campaign and Russia.
Background: The investigation led by Special Counsel Robert Mueller (2017–2019) concluded that while Russia did interfere in the 2016 election to support Donald Trump, the investigation did not establish that members of the Trump campaign conspired or coordinated with the Russian government in its election interference activities.
Impeachment Connection: While the “Russia hoax” rhetoric is often tied to the Mueller probe, the first impeachment of Donald Trump in 2019 was actually centered on charges of abuse of power and obstruction of Congress related to his dealings with Ukraine. However, Bondi and her allies frequently view these separate events—the Russia investigation and the subsequent impeachments—as a continuous, politically motivated effort to delegitimize the Trump presidency. By demanding an apology, Bondi is asserting that the premise of these years-long investigations was flawed and damaging.
Objections and Counter-Arguments
The Democratic members of the committee immediately pushed back against Bondi’s outburst, characterizing it as a deliberate distraction from the oversight issues at hand.
“Theatrics” and Evasion: Representative Nadler and Ranking Member Jamie Raskin (D-MD) accused Bondi of “filibustering” and engaging in “theatrics” to avoid answering substantive questions. Specifically, Nadler had been questioning Bondi on the Department of Justice’s handling of sensitive files and the indictment status of specific individuals, which Democrats argue she failed to address.
Procedural Clash: Rep. Raskin interjected during the exchange, stating, “You can let her filibuster all day long, not on our watch, not on our time.” This led to further personal barbs, with Bondi reportedly dismissing Raskin’s legal credentials in the heat of the moment.
Oversight Role: Critics of Bondi’s approach argue that an Attorney General’s role in such hearings is to provide transparent answers regarding DOJ operations, regardless of past political grievances. They contend that relitigating the 2019 impeachment or the 2016 Russia investigation serves no purpose in a 2026 oversight hearing and undermines the committee’s ability to hold the current Justice Department accountable.
Outcome
The hearing eventually continued, though the atmosphere remained highly charged. Bondi’s refusal to back down signaled a combative stance from the DOJ toward the House Judiciary Committee, setting the stage for likely future confrontations between the Attorney General and congressional Democrats.
meaww.com
tampafp.com
yahoo.com
cbsnews.com
theguardian.com
knewz.com
