DHS Official: 70% of ICE Arrests Now Involve Noncitizens with Criminal Charges or Convictions
WASHINGTON — In a significant update on federal immigration enforcement operations, a Department of Homeland Security (DHS) official stated this week that over 70% of arrests made by U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) involve individuals who have either been convicted of a crime or have pending criminal charges in the United States.
The statistic, highlighted by DHS Assistant Secretary Tricia McLaughlin, comes amidst a sweeping intensification of interior enforcement operations initiated in early 2025. The announcement aims to bolster the administration’s position that its “mass deportation” agenda is successfully targeting individuals who pose a threat to public safety and the rule of law.
Deep Search: Breaking Down the Numbers
While the 70% figure suggests a high rate of criminality among arrestees, a deeper analysis of the data reveals crucial nuances in how these statistics are categorized. The metric combines individuals with finalized criminal convictions alongside those with only “pending charges.” This distinction is vital, as the latter category includes individuals who have been accused but not yet found guilty in a court of law.
Furthermore, the definition of “criminal” in this context is broad. It encompasses a wide spectrum of offenses ranging from serious felonies—such as homicide, assault, and drug trafficking—to non-violent misdemeanors and administrative violations. Historical data from FY 2024 indicated that while a similar percentage of arrests (71.7%) involved criminal histories, the absolute number of arrests was significantly lower than the surge observed in the first quarter of 2026. The current strategy appears to be casting a much wider net, increasing the volume of arrests across all categories.
Background: A Shift in Enforcement Priorities
This update reflects a sharp pivot in federal immigration policy following the transition to the new administration in January 2025. Under the previous administration, ICE enforcement was generally narrower, prioritizing individuals deemed “threats to national security, public safety, and border security.”
Since early 2025, however, the executive branch has implemented a zero-tolerance approach, reinstating broader arrest mandates and deprioritizing the discretionary exemptions that previously protected certain non-violent individuals. Reports indicate that ICE administrative arrests have more than tripled in some regions over the last year. This operational expansion has been supported by the redeployment of personnel and increased cooperation with local law enforcement agencies, reversing trends from the 2021-2024 period where “detainer” requests had dipped.
Objections: Critics Dispute the “Dangerous Criminal” Narrative
Despite the official figures, immigration advocacy groups and legal experts have raised significant objections to the administration’s framing of the data. Critics argue that conflating “charged” with “convicted” inflates the perception of danger, noting that pending charges can be dropped or result in acquittals.
Recent analyses of internal DHS data by news organizations and watchdogs, such as the Cato Institute and CBS News, have suggested that the percentage of arrests involving violent criminals may actually be shrinking relative to the total number of arrests. Some internal reports leaked earlier in February 2026 indicated that nearly 40% of recent ICE arrestees had no criminal record at all, and were detained solely for civil immigration violations.
“The administration is presenting a statistic that lumps traffic violators and people with unproven accusations in with violent offenders to justify a dragnet approach,” said a representative from a leading immigrant rights legal center. “When you look closely at the data, a significant portion of these ‘criminals’ have no convictions for serious offenses, yet they are being treated as top-tier public safety threats.”
As operations continue, the disparity between official government statements and the granular data analyzed by independent watchdogs remains a focal point of the national debate on immigration reform and enforcement efficacy.
ncronline.org
cbp.gov
cis.org
youtube.com
cbsnews.com
