Antioch Residents Voice Strong Opposition to Proposed Redevelopment of Centennial Park
A wave of opposition has swept through Antioch as residents push back against the village’s recently announced plans to redevelop Centennial Park. The controversy centers on a proposal to modernize the beloved community space, a project that many locals fear will erase a significant piece of the town’s history and character.
The dispute follows the recent announcement that the Village of Antioch secured a $600,000 Open Space Land Acquisition and Development (OSLAD) grant from the Illinois Department of Natural Resources. The funding is intended to support a broader revitalization effort scheduled to begin in 2026, which city officials say will improve accessibility, add a new shelter, and update tennis courts and trails. However, the designation of the project as a “redevelopment” has sparked tremendous outcry from residents who are deeply protective of the park’s existing structures.
At the heart of the community’s objection is the potential loss or alteration of the park’s unique wooden playground, known locally as “Timbertown.” This structure holds immense sentimental value, having been constructed in 1992 by hundreds of community volunteers in just five days to mark the village’s centennial anniversary. For many residents, the park is not merely a recreational facility but a monument to the town’s collaborative spirit.
“It feels like they are paving over our memories,” said one long-time resident during a recent discussion on the plans. Objections raised by the community include concerns that the new “modern” designs will lack the charm of the original wooden structures and that the decision-making process has not sufficiently prioritized the preservation of the volunteer-built elements. Residents have also expressed unease about the potential construction noise and the disruption of green space usage during the lengthy project timeline.
Village officials have attempted to assuage fears by emphasizing that the renovations are necessary to meet current safety standards and Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) compliance, ensuring the park remains usable for future generations. They argue that the grant provides a rare financial opportunity to address aging infrastructure without heavily burdening local taxpayers.
Despite these assurances, the outcry continues to grow, with residents organizing to attend upcoming board meetings to demand that any redevelopment plan explicitly preserves the integrity of the original community-built features. The tension highlights a broader challenge facing the municipality: balancing the need for infrastructure modernization with the preservation of local heritage and community sentiment.
repweber.com
il.gov
