Opinion: Success of Trump’s Venezuela Policy Depends on Rapid Elections
An opinion piece published in the Miami Herald argues that President Donald Trump’s recent move to apprehend Venezuelan leader Nicolás Maduro marks only the beginning of a complex diplomatic challenge. According to the article, the ultimate success of this intervention—dubbed the “Trump Corollary” to the Monroe Doctrine—relies heavily on how quickly the United States can facilitate the election of legitimate local leaders.
The commentary follows reports of a high-stakes operation resulting in Maduro’s indictment and capture, a move that has reshaped the geopolitical landscape of Latin America. While the Trump administration, led by Secretary of State Marco Rubio, has reportedly ruled out a long-term military occupation, the current strategy involves directing transitional orders through Maduro’s successor, Delcy Rodríguez.
The text suggests that relying on remnants of the former regime to maintain stability poses significant risks. The author contends that the sole objective of the current interim figures is to maintain power, which could lead to stagnation and continued resistance against U.S. influence. The core argument posits that a clear, expedited timetable for restoring democratic institutions is essential. Only through legitimate governance can Venezuela hope to unlock international cooperation, rebuild its dilapidated infrastructure, and revitalize an oil sector that has plummeted from producing three million barrels per day to a fraction of that output due to decades of neglect and mismanagement.
However, the push for rapid transitions faces skepticism. Critics of U.S. interventionism argue that imposing timelines or selecting preferred outcomes undermines Venezuelan sovereignty and mirrors historical imperialism. Furthermore, political analysts warn that rushing elections in a destabilized environment without robust institutional safeguards could lead to further chaos or the rise of new populist figures. There is also contention regarding the U.S. stance on existing opposition leaders, with some observers noting tensions between the administration’s plans and the autonomy of Venezuelan political figures like María Corina Machado.
The opinion concludes that while the removal of a dictator is a decisive action, the restoration of a functioning democracy requires a swift pivot from military objectives to diplomatic reconstruction.
miamiherald.com
miamiherald.com
newsnow.com
miamiherald.com
miamiherald.com
time.com
