Clintons Agree to Testify in House Oversight Probe into Jeffrey Epstein Amid Contempt Threat
WASHINGTON — Former President Bill Clinton and former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton have agreed to testify before the House Oversight Committee regarding its investigation into the late financier and convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein. The decision, announced Monday, comes just days before the House of Representatives was scheduled to vote on holding the couple in criminal contempt of Congress for defying earlier subpoenas.
The agreement marks a significant reversal for the Clintons, who had previously refused to comply with the Republican-led panel’s demands. For months, legal representatives for the couple argued that the subpoenas were legally invalid and constituted a partisan effort to distract from other political issues. However, facing the imminent threat of a contempt resolution that could have referred them to the Department of Justice for prosecution, the former first couple has opted to appear for depositions.
Angel Ureña, a spokesperson for former President Clinton, confirmed the development in a statement, signaling a shift in strategy. “The former President and former Secretary of State will be there,” Ureña stated. “They look forward to setting a precedent that applies to everyone.” The statement also criticized the committee’s handling of the negotiations, asserting that the Clintons had attempted to engage in good faith while accusing the committee of politicizing the investigation.
House Oversight Committee Chairman James Comer (R-Ky.) acknowledged the development but maintained a cautious stance regarding the specifics of the testimony. In a statement released shortly after the Clintons’ announcement, Comer indicated that while the agreement to testify effectively pauses the contempt proceedings, the terms of their appearance remain under final negotiation.
“The Clintons’ counsel has said they agree to terms, but we must ensure those terms provide the transparency and answers the American people deserve,” Comer said. “I will clarify the terms they are agreeing to and then discuss next steps with my committee members. Subpoenas are not mere suggestions; they carry the force of law and require compliance.”
The investigation by the Oversight Committee is part of a broader congressional inquiry into the handling of the Jeffrey Epstein case by federal authorities. Lawmakers are examining why federal prosecutors entered into a non-prosecution agreement with Epstein in 2008 and how the financier maintained high-level connections with prominent figures in politics, business, and academia despite his criminal record. Epstein died in a Manhattan jail cell in 2019 while awaiting trial on sex trafficking charges; his death was ruled a suicide by the medical examiner.
Republicans on the committee have long sought testimony from Bill Clinton, citing flight logs that show the former president traveled on Epstein’s private plane on multiple occasions in the early 2000s. Clinton has previously acknowledged the flights, stating they were related to the work of the Clinton Foundation, but has vehemently denied any knowledge of Epstein’s crimes or any inappropriate conduct. Hillary Clinton has not been accused of any wrongdoing in connection with Epstein, but the committee has sought her testimony regarding her knowledge of the investigation during her tenure in public office.
The impending contempt vote, which had been approved by the House Oversight Committee along party lines, would have been a historic rebuke. Contempt of Congress charges are rare for former presidents and cabinet officials, and a successful vote would have placed significant pressure on the Justice Department to decide whether to pursue criminal charges.
By agreeing to testify, the Clintons have likely de-escalated a constitutional showdown, though the upcoming depositions are expected to be contentious. The testimony will likely take place in a closed-door setting, a standard procedure for sensitive congressional investigations, with transcripts potentially released to the public at a later date.
As negotiations over the logistics of the testimony continue, the focus now shifts to what new information, if any, the former president and secretary of state can provide regarding one of the most sprawling and opaque scandals in recent American history.
* sundayguardianlive.com
* washingtonpost.com
* wikipedia.org
* thehindu.com
* theguardian.com
* forbes.com
* kyivpost.com
* cbsnews.com
* ynetnews.com
* timesofisrael.com
* pbs.org
